Change and contrariety in Aristotle, James Bogen Aristotle says that in all coming to be and passing away things arise from or perish into contraries or into intermediates which lie in between and are derived from contraries (physics 188b21-26, and elsewhere). This paper takes up two questions about this:(1) does Aristotle say enough [Book Review]

&
Phronesis 37 (1) (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

De Generatione et Corruptione 2.3: Does Aristotle Identify The Contraries As Elements?Timothy J. Crowley - 2013 - Classical Quarterly 63 (1):161-182.
Change and Contrariety in Aristotle.James Bogen - 1992 - Phronesis 37 (1):1-21.
Souls and the Location of Time in Physics IV 14, 223a16–223a29.Tim Loughlin - 2011 - Apeiron 44 (4):307-325.
Aristotle’s Great Clock.James Bogen & J. E. McGuire - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:387-448.
Ancient Classics for English Readers. Aristotle.Alexander Grant - unknown
The Place of I 7 in the Argument of Physics I.Sean Kelsey - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (2):180 - 208.
The place of I 7 in the argument of Physics I.Sean Kelsey - 2008 - Phronesis 53 (2):180-208.
Aristotle Physics I 8.Sean Kelsey - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (4):330 - 361.
Aristotle on the subject matter of geometry.Richard Pettigrew - 2009 - Phronesis 54 (3):239-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-05

Downloads
12 (#1,058,801)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references