The “mesh” as evidence–model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):505-506 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We agree that the relationship between phenomenology and accessibility can be fruitfully investigated via meshing, but we want to emphasise the importance of proper comparison between meshes, as well as considerations that make comparison especially difficult in this domain. We also argue that Block's interpretation of the neural data in his exemplar mesh is incorrect, and propose an alternative

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Phenomenal consciousness, attention and accessibility.Tobias Schlicht - 2012 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (3):309-334.
Experience and agency: Slipping the mesh.Andy Clark & Julian Kiverstein - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):502-503.
Parsimony and the triple-system model of concepts.Safa Zaki & Joe Cruz - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):230-231.
Relative Interpretation Between Logics.Toby Meadows - 2021 - Erkenntnis 88 (8):3203-3220.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
23 (#705,674)

6 months
8 (#415,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward a theory of visual consciousness.Semir Zeki & Andreas Bartels - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (2):225-59.

Add more references