To Reverse our Premiss with the Perverse Core — A Response to Žižek's “Theology” in Chinese Context

Revue Internationale de Philosophie 261 (3):381-397 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary Western thought might be somehow characterized by the interaction of theology and humanities, and their refusal to the one-dimension subject. The reason why Slavoj Žižek tries to fight for “the Christian legacy” and “the perverse core of Christianity”— with “structure,” “narrative,” “symbolic order” and other conceptual tools normally used in literary studies—is believed to be a rediscovery of the role of Christianity and theology as the archetype for rendering truth and value system instead of a religious experience merely. And so, the argument of identity and meaning-generation might be rephrased in a different framework. This paper intends to trace Žižek’s works theologically and reinterpret its potentiality in Chinese context.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-01

Downloads
31 (#532,577)

6 months
18 (#152,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

H. E. Yang
National Yang Ming University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references