Abstract

Prior to the Liu Fenglu only suspect, the negative "Tso" sporadic arguments, but no system of thought, but these arguments are Liufeng Lu negative "Zuo Zhuan" of rebellion. Liu Fenglu first proposed in the classics in the history of the negative 'Tso' systems thinking: one that "Tso Spring" with the "Yan Zi Chun Qiu" and similar histories, essentially eliminating the "Tso" and "Spring," the association ; the second is to denounce Liu Xin's fake attack "Spring Zuo" is fake product by Liu Xin. This theory is said can not help but have far-fetched, but in the History of the Qing Dynasty and later by the cultural history had a tremendous impact. In stead of forming the systematic thought, there was only a few doubts and deny about Zuo Zhuan before Liu Fenglu. All these arguments made a basis for Liu Fenglu to deny Zuo Zhuan. For the first time in the history of classics Liu Fenglu put forward the systematic thought of denying Zuo Zhuo, which has two meanings. First, it made clear that Zuo Zhuan is similar to books like YanZi's Spring and Autumn Annuals, which eliminate the relationship between Zuo Zhuan and Spring and Autumn Annuals Second, it criticized the forgery of Liu Xin by saying that Zuo Zhuan is the production forged by Liu Xin. Even though there is a little eisegesis, but it has made great influence for the history of classics in Qing Dynasty and late cultural history