Maharbal's bon mot: authenticity and survival

Classical Quarterly 50 (02):610- (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Did the Carthaginian cavalry general Maharbal really urge Hannibal to march on Rome after Cannae, and then comment bitterly Vincere sets, Hannibal; victoria uti nescis, when his leader refused? There are two main objections: Maharbal may not have been there, and anyway Cannae was too far away to justify such a march. The whole story has been seen as one of those well-known Roman historiographical inventions. But there may well be more to the story than that, illuminating both Hannibalic history and some Roman historiographical techniques

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,533

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
30 (#625,516)

6 months
4 (#1,145,416)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Livy: His Historical Aims and Methods.Konrad Gries & P. G. Walsh - 1963 - American Journal of Philology 84 (2):208.

Add more references