Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47 (2007)
AbstractLike Aristophanes’ Frogs, Plato’s Symposium stages a contest between literary genres. The quarrel between Socrates and Aristophanes constitutes the primary axis of this contest, and the speech of Alcibiades echoes and extends that of Aristophanes. Alcibiades’ comparison of Socrates with a satyr, however, contains the key to understanding Socrates’ implication, at the very end of the dialogue, that philosophy alone understands the inner connectedness, and hence the proper nature, of both tragedy and comedy. I argue that Plato reflects in the character of Socrates the primordial wisdom embodied in satyric drama. I conclude with a brief consideration of Nietzsche’s challenge to Plato’s Dionysian wisdom
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Beyond Petipa and Before the Academy: Plato, Socrates, and Alexei Ratmansky’s Serenade After Plato’s Symposium.Kristin Boyce - 2019 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 44 (1):260-278.
Similar books and articles
Love as a Problem of Knowledge in Kierkegaard's Either/Or and Plato's Symposium.Ulrika Carlsson - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (1):41-67.
Socrates on Friendship and Community: Reflections on Plato's Symposium, Phaedrus, and Lysis.Mary P. Nichols - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
Erotic Wisdom: Philosophy and Intermediacy in Plato's Symposium.Gary Alan Scott & William A. Welton - 2008 - Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Review of Frisbee C. C. Sheffield, Plato’s Symposium: The Ethics of Desire (Oxford University Press, 2006). [REVIEW]John M. Armstrong - 2009 - Ancient Philosophy 29 (1):208–212.