Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95:19 - 35 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Brad Hooker; II*—Rule-Consequentialism, Incoherence, Fairness1, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 95, Issue 1, 1 June 1995, Pages 19–36, https://d.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rule-consequentialism's dilemma.Iain Law - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):263-276.
Variable versus fixed-rate rule-utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.
A refutation of consequentialism.Robert Guay - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):348-362.
The Incoherence Objection in Moral Theory.Eric Wiland - 2010 - Acta Analytica 25 (3):279-284.
The demandingness objection.Brad Hooker - 2009 - In T. Chappell (ed.), The Problem of Moral Demandingness. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 148-162.
Hierarchical consequentialism.Re'em Segev - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (3):309-330.
Is Rule-Consequentialism a Rubber Duck?Brad Hooker - 1994 - Analysis 54 (2):92 - 97.
Rule-consequentialism and obligations toward the needy.Brad Hooker - 1998 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 79 (1):19–33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
65 (#249,528)

6 months
4 (#790,394)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brad Hooker
University of Reading

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references