On the View of the Self in the Zhuangzi, through an Analysis of "Wu Sang Wo"

Philosophy and Culture 34 (5):157-174 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article aims to The "I Lose Myself," as the center, to explore the "Zhuangzi" self-concept. This paper analyzes the proposition I Lose Myself, in order to clarify the I, I and the ideal personality / relationship between people, said: "Zhuangzi" I and my so-called, refers to two points is not subject to the other or self, but two kind of level of self; so this two-self, I can not be called true and false me. Its subject is also divided into two so that's my funeral I did not lose me with the I; as opposed to "Zhuangzi" person view, were the crowd and the ideal personality. Further the officer, the two self-concept is the "Zhuangzi" "Road - objects" corresponding structure of metaphysics; Accordingly, the "Zhuangzi" itself can not be relativist. As a result, we can see the "Zhuangzi" the reflection of the self-centered, even in the Road on the feature of which is to fully grasp the Road and the distance between the official language. In short, this article attempts to construct propositions accordingly, "Zhuangzi" self-concept of the system, as we understand the ideal personality theory and its metaphysical approaches one. The purpose of this paper is to construct a systematic view of the self in the Zhuangzi by the statement of wu sang wo which appears in "Qi Wu Lun." By doing so, we can better understand the ideal Zhuangzian personae and the metaphysics of the Zhuangzi. An analysis of the statement of wu sang wo is my first step which leads to the following points: wu and wo are two levels of self rather than so called "true self" and "false self." Wu refers to a subject while wo refers to a property of a subject; There are two kinds of subjects: one is the subject lacking a limitative self , of which ideal personae such as the zhenren or shenren are. The other is the subject which lives in the limitative self and common people are best understood in this light. Having gone into the details of the limitative self and the holistic self in the Zhuangzi, I connect this view of the self with a dao-wu structure of metaphysics in the Zhuangzi, showing its reflection of egoism and its contribution to the theory of dao

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Does the Sounding? The Metaphysics of the First-Person Pronoun in the Zhuangzi.Thomas Ming - 2016 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 15 (1):57-79.
Zhuangzi and Simone Weil on Decreating the Self.Ryan Harte - 2022 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 14 (3):281-294.
“I Lost Myself”: A Classical Idea of the Self.Chen Shaoming - 2017 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 48 (2):95-109.
Unsaying the said: Emmanuel Levinas and the Zhuangzi on linguistic scepticism.Martine Berenpas - 2019 - Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 10 (1):87-99.
The Dao and Self-reflection in Zhuangzi.Ming-Chao Lin - 2010 - Philosophy and Culture 37 (10):25-45.
Zhuangzi and Personal Autonomy.Jeff Morgan - 2023 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 22 (4):605-621.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
1 (#1,919,373)

6 months
1 (#1,722,767)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references