Maxwell’s contrived analogy: An early version of the methodology of modeling

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43 (4):236-257 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term “analogy” stands for a variety of methodological practices all related in one way or another to the idea of proportionality. We claim that in his first substantial contribution to electromagnetism James Clerk Maxwell developed a methodology of analogy which was completely new at the time or, to borrow John North’s expression, Maxwell’s methodology was a “newly contrived analogue”. In his initial response to Michael Faraday’s experimental researches in electromagnetism, Maxwell did not seek an analogy with some physical system in a domain different from electromagnetism as advocated by William Thomson; rather, he constructed an entirely artificial one to suit his needs. Following North, we claim that the modification which Maxwell introduced to the methodology of analogy has not been properly appreciated. In view of our examination of the evidence, we argue that Maxwell gave a new meaning to analogy; in fact, it comes close to modeling in current usage.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abstraction via generic modeling in concept formation in science.Nancy J. Nersessian - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 86 (1):117-144.
Maxwell's Methodology and his application of it to Electromagnetism.A. F. Chalmers - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (2):107.
Argument by Analogy.André Juthe - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):1-27.
Maxwell on the method of physical analogy.Joseph Turner - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (23):226-238.
Darwin, Herschel, and the role of analogy in Darwin's origin.Peter Gildenhuys - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (4):593-611.
Darwin, Herschel, and the role of analogy in Darwin’s origin.Peter Gildenhuys - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 35 (4):593-611.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-19

Downloads
53 (#299,469)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Giora Hon
University of Haifa

References found in this work

Models in Science (2nd edition).Roman Frigg & Stephan Hartmann - 2021 - The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Models, analogies, and theories.Peter Achinstein - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (4):328-350.
Scientists' thoughts on scientific models.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2002 - Perspectives on Science 10 (3):275-301.
Maxwell's Methodology and his application of it to Electromagnetism.A. F. Chalmers - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (2):107.
Aether/Or: The Creation of Scientific Concepts.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):175.

View all 11 references / Add more references