Ethics, Hermeneutics, and Eudaimonics

International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (2):243-256 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Contemporary ethical theory ought to take both the biological and cultural constitution of human subjects into account. But the coupling of these constraints raises questions about the scope of each. In this paper I defend the view that, rather than predetermining human moral sensibility, or founding a universal ethic on that basis, the biological constitution of human beings actually prefigures their wide variability across cultures and argues for the open-endedness of questions of meaning and value. I defend this conception against Owen Flanagan’s neo-Darwinian “Eudaimonics” as well as against various forms of ethical a priorism and ethical skepticism, making critical use of Charles Taylor’s hermeneutic conception of human moral valuation



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A hard problem indeed.Gregory R. Peterson - 2009 - Zygon 44 (1):19-29.
The Basis of Human Moral Status.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):159-179.
Michalos and the theory of ethical theory.Bernard J. Hodgson - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (1-2):19 - 23.
To What Extent Must We Go Beyond Neo-Aristotelian Ethical Naturalism?David McPherson - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):627-654.
The biological roots of morality.Francisco J. Ayala - 1987 - Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):235-252.


Added to PP

20 (#565,488)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phillip Honenberger
Morgan State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references