On Being in an Undiscoverable Position

Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):33-40 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Paradox of the Surprise Examination has been a testing ground for a variety of frameworks in formal epistemology, from epistemic logic to probability theory to game theory and more. In this paper, I treat a related paradox, the Paradox of the Undiscoverable Position, as a test case for the possible-worlds style representation of epistemic states. I argue that the paradox can be solved in this framework, further illustrating the power of possible-worlds style modeling. The solution also illustrates an important distinction between anti-performatory and unassimilable announcements of information.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,867

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-22

Downloads
240 (#86,640)

6 months
25 (#143,982)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Wesley H. Holliday
University of California, Berkeley

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Blindspots.Roy A. Sorensen - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Reference and Reflexivity.John Perry - 2001 - Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
What one may come to know.J. van Benthem - 2004 - Analysis 64 (2):95-105.

View all 12 references / Add more references