- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review: Fleischacker, A third concept of liberty: Judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith [Book Review]
Philosophical Review 110 (3):437-440 (2001)
Abstract
Here Samuel Fleischacker undertakes an ambitious task. Primarily he aims to develop and defend an account of political liberty importantly distinct from the alternatives Isaiah Berlin made famous. Moreover, he promises to enunciate this account by appeal to Kant and Adam Smith and to demonstrate its practical strengths by comparison with the work of several contemporary political theorists, Rawls most significant among them.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [2] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [3] (no proxy)
- philreview.dukejournals.org [4] (no proxy)
- jstor.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org (no proxy)
- pdcnet.org [2] (no proxy)
- read.dukeupress.edu
(no proxy) - jstor.org [2] (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review: Fleischacker, A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. [REVIEW]Elisabeth Ellis - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (3):447-449.
Fleischacker, Samuel. A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. [REVIEW]James R. Otteson - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):426-428.
Samuel Fleischacker, A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Philosophy in Review 20 (4):249-252.
A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgement and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. By Samuel Fleischacker. [REVIEW]M. Bevir - 2001 - The European Legacy 6 (5):659-659.
A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. [REVIEW]Elisabeth Ellis - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (3):447-449.
A Third Concept of Liberty: Judgment and Freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. [REVIEW]James R. Otteson - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):426-427.
A third concept of liberty: judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith.Samuel Fleischacker - 1999 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Notes.Samuel Fleischacker - 1999 - In A third concept of liberty: judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 279-328.
Contents.Samuel Fleischacker - 1999 - In A third concept of liberty: judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Index.Samuel Fleischacker - 1999 - In A third concept of liberty: judgment and freedom in Kant and Adam Smith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 329-336.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-12
Downloads
30 (#550,897)
6 months
82 (#64,618)
2010-09-12
Downloads
30 (#550,897)
6 months
82 (#64,618)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Adam Smith's ''Sympathetic Imagination'' and the Aesthetic Appreciation of Environment.Emily Brady - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):95-109.
Reasoning about Development: Essays on Amartya Sen's Capability Approach.Thomas R. Wells - 2013 - Dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam
Aristotle’s Difficult Relationship With Modern Economic Theory.Spencer J. Pack - 2008 - Foundations of Science 13 (3-4):265-280.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-68866f4b87-s5tms uwo