“Take-the-Best” and Other Simple Strategies: Why and When they Work “Well” with Binary Cues

Theory and Decision 61 (3):205-249 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The effectiveness of decision rules depends on characteristics of both rules and environments. A theoretical analysis of environments specifies the relative predictive accuracies of the “take-the-best” heuristic and other simple strategies for choices between two outcomes based on binary cues. We identify three factors: how cues are weighted; characteristics of choice sets; and error. In the absence of error and for cases involving from three to five binary cues, TTB is effective across many environments. However, hybrids of equal weights and TTB models are more effective as environments become more compensatory. As error in the environment increases, the predictive ability of all models is systematically degraded. Indeed, using the datasets of Gigerenzer et al., TTB and similar models do not predict much better than a naïve model that exploits dominance. Finally, we emphasize that the results reported here are conditional on binary cues.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,181

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work.Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.
Invariants and Cues.James E. Cutting - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):102-103.
From Simon 's Scissors for Rationality to Abc's Adaptive Toolbox.X. T. Wang - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Integrating Cues in Speech Perception.Dominic W. Massaro - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):275-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
60 (#195,309)

6 months
1 (#413,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?