The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis: FRANK J. HOFFMAN

Religious Studies 18 (2):151-158 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In what follows I argue for two interrelated theses: that early Buddhism is not a form of empiricism, and that consequently there is no basis for an early Buddhist apologetic which contrasts an empirical early Buddhism with either a metaphysical Hinduism on the one hand, or with a baseless Christianity on the other

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Buddhist Empiricism Thesis.Frank J. Hoffman - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (2):151 - 158.
Buddhist Belief ‘In’.F. J. Hoffman - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (3):381-387.
Rethinking Experience in Early Buddhism.Frank J. Hoffman - 2003 - In Mahinda Deegalle (ed.), Pali Buddhism. Jain Publishing Co..
Rationality and Mind in Early Buddhism.Frank J. Hoffman - 1987, 1992, 2002 - Motilal Banarsidass.
On Nagarjuna.Frank J. Hoffman - 1976 - Middle Way: Journal of the London Buddhist Society (3).
“Contemporary Buddhist Philosophy”.Frank J. Hoffman - 1997 - In Brian Carr and Indira Mahalingam (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of Asian Philosophy. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
36 (#441,072)

6 months
10 (#261,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Frank J. Hoffman
West Chester University

Citations of this work

Buddhist functionalism—instrumentality reaffirmed.David Scott - 1995 - Asian Philosophy 5 (2):127 – 149.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references