Discussion between Philip Højme and Andrew P. Keltner: On Tech

Gcas Magazine (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Both Philip and Andrew are philosophy students whose interests converge around the philosophy of technology broadly understood. Philip's interest is specifically aimed toward the ethics of Transhumanism and depictions of Transhumanism in works of fiction. On the other hand, Andrew finds himself more focused on religious behavior in the technological world. While the two perspectives might not seem that close, there is certain to be an overlap in Andrew and Philip's shared understanding of how technological phenomena play a crucial role concerning religion and society.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incommunicability, Relationality, and Self- Donation.Andrew Grosso - 2009 - Tradition and Discovery 36 (3):31-34.
Technological Democracy or Democratic Technology?Jeff Kochan - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):401-412.
Andrew Feenberg, Critical theory of technology.A. J. Cohen - 1994 - Theory and Society 23:575-575.
Thinking technology, thinking nature.Dana S. Belu - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (6):572 – 591.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-22

Downloads
166 (#120,124)

6 months
90 (#57,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Højme (Hoejme)
Polish Academy of Sciences (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references