Social epistemology as risk management of technoscience: The rationale and a model of democratization of science

Social Epistemology 13 (3 & 4):257 – 261 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Article does not have an abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/026917299298574

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Morality, Reason, and Management Science: The Rationale of Cost-Benefit Analysis.David Copp - 1985 - Social Philosophy and Policy 2 (2):128.
The philosophical impact of technoscience or the development of a pragmatic philosophy of science.Ramón Queraltó - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):113-125.
The ties to bind: Techno-science, ethics and democracy.Fuyuki Kurasawa - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):159-186.
Risk, uncertainty, and rational action.Carlo Jaeger (ed.) - 2001 - London: Earthscan.
Epistemology and Risk Management.Nassim N. Taleb & Avital Pilpel - 2007 - Risk and Regulation 13:6--7.
Strategic reputation risk management.Judy Larkin - 2003 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Risk management principles for nanotechnology.Gary E. Marchant, Douglas J. Sylvester & Kenneth W. Abbott - 2008 - NanoEthics 2 (1):43-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#550,902)

6 months
7 (#430,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.

Add more references