- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
INTRODUCTION Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely
Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):1-3 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Corruption and representations of scholarly output.Robert Liebler - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):259-269.
Depiction of idealized youth lifestyles in magazine advertisements: A content analysis. [REVIEW]Robin T. Peterson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):259 - 269.
Digital document and interpretation: re-thinking “text” and scholarship in electronic settings. [REVIEW]Stefan Gradmann & Jan Christoph Meister - 2008 - Poiesis and Praxis 5 (2):139-153.
Extreme and restricted utilitarianism.J. J. C. Smart - 1956 - Philosophical Quarterly 6 (25):344-354.
Utilitarianism and the rules of war.R. B. Brandt - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):145-165.
A theory of freedom of expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-08-24
Downloads
22 (#705,671)
6 months
2 (#1,186,462)
2010-08-24
Downloads
22 (#705,671)
6 months
2 (#1,186,462)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Open access publishing: a service or a detriment to science?Graham J. Pierce & Ioannis Theodossiou - 2018 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 18:37-48.
Journal visibility, self-citation, and reference limits: influences on Impact Factor and author performance review.P. W. Sammarco - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (2):121-125.
A multi-objective method to align human resource allocation with university strategy.Philippe Bouillard - 2016 - Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 20 (1):17-23.
Evaluating Webs of Knowledge A Critical Examination of the 'Impact Factor'.Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis - 2010 - Logos 21 (3):58-73.
References found in this work
Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results.Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Christoph Neuhaus & Hans-Dieter Daniel - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):93-102.
Using a balanced approach to bibliometrics: quantitative performance measures in the Australian Research Quality Framework.Linda Butler - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):83-92.
Validating research performance metrics against peer rankings.Stevan Harnad - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):103-107.
The siege of science.Michael Taylor, Pandelis Perakakis & Varvara Trachana - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):17-40.
Lost in publication: how measurement harms science.Peter A. Lawrence - 2008 - Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1):9-11.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo