Space philosophy: Schelling and the mathematicians of the nineteenth century

Angelaki 21 (4):43-57 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

INSPIRED by a dynamist Naturphilosophie and looking for a mathematics of the natura naturans, the founders of modern mathematics in Germany made some lasting contributions in the attempt to go beyond perceptible space. Hermann Grassmann’s extension theory, Johann Benedict Listing’s topology, Bernhard Riemann’s non-Euclidean manifold theory, Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi’s approach to non-mechanistic theory and last but not least Georg Cantor’s transfinite set theory were all influenced by the tradition of Naturphilosophie. One central motivation for the new mathematics was to decipher the so-called “inner side of nature” which was thought to be invisible but nonetheless physical. As a result, mathematics was understood not only in terms of quantity but of morphogenetic quality and as a tool to recognize the intrinsic possibilities of structuring and organizing nature. This essay focuses on the philosophical viewpoints of Christian Samuel Weiss, Justus and Hermann Grassmann, Bernhard Riemann and their reception of Schelling’s philosophy. Riemann deconstructed empiricist theories of space so as to glean the fundamental constitution of space. One result was that a given, fixed and static metric is not necessary for the understanding of space. The underlying topological substratum has no specific metric but is capable of exhibiting any possible metric. Riemann’s claims are compared with Schelling’s theory of space in his “Darstellung des Naturprocesses”. My thesis is that Schelling’s philosophy of the emergence of space can be read in Riemannian terms and that it is an interesting model in the context of modern questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Grunbaum's Metrical Conventionalism.Dennis Wayne Christopher - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
On local non‐compactness in recursive mathematics.Jakob G. Simonsen - 2006 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 52 (4):323-330.
Hermann Weyl on Minkowskian Space–Time and Riemannian Geometry.Yvon Gauthier - 2005 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):261 – 269.
Dynamic topological logic of metric spaces.David Fernández-Duque - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (1):308-328.
Strange couplings and space-time structure.Steven Weinstein - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):70.
The Kripke schema in metric topology.Robert Lubarsky, Fred Richman & Peter Schuster - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (6):498-501.
Reverse mathematics and π21 comprehension.Carl Mummert & Stephen G. Simpson - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):526-533.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Alexander Paseau (ed.) - 2016 - New York: Routledge.
Kant, Herbart and Riemann.Erik C. Banks - 2005 - Kant Studien 96 (2):208-234.
Extension and Measurement: A Constructivist Program from Leibniz to Grassmann.Erik C. Banks - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (1):20-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-28

Downloads
34 (#465,511)

6 months
9 (#299,476)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emergent spacetime and empirical (in) coherence.Nick Huggett & Christian Wüthrich - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):276-285.
Sämtliche Werke.[author unknown] - 1845 - Berlin Veit.

Add more references