Ørsted, Mach, and the history of ‘thought experiment’

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 30 (5):837-858 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Until recently, leading work on the philosophy of thought experiments mistakenly credited Mach with coining the term. While Ørsted’s prior use has become more widely acknowledged, there remains a c...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-22

Downloads
42 (#390,669)

6 months
19 (#145,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eleanor Helms
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Citations of this work

Kierkegaard’s account of thought experiment: a method of variation.Eleanor Helms - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Modal Epistemology and the Rationalist Renaissance.George Bealer - 2002 - In Tamar Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 71-125.
Modal epistemology.Peter Van Inwagen - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 92 (1):67--84.
Modal Epistemology.E. Weber & T. DeMey (eds.) - 2004 - Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belgie vor Wetenschappen en Kunsten.

View all 35 references / Add more references