Judgment, Rhetoric, and the Problem of Incommensurability: Recalling Practical Wisdom

Univ of South Carolina Press (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an age of diversity and pluralism, asks Hiedlebaugh (communication studies, Oswego State U. of New York), how can people talk productively about those issues that most divide them. Two main sub- questions generated by her investigation are how people can reason together to make good decisions when standards for what counts as reasonable vary profoundly, and how can they know how to produce good rhetoric when standards for what counts as good are shifting. c. Book News Inc.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Contemporary Virtue Ethics Might Learn from Aristotle’s Rhetoric.Gregory R. Beabout - 2013 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 87:155-166.
The will as reason.Pamela Hieronymi - 2009 - Philosophical Perspectives 23 (1):201-220.
Logic or rhetoric in law?Alain Lempereur - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (3):283-297.
Enthymemes: Body and Soul.Arthur B. Miller & John D. Bee - 1972 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 5 (4):201 - 214.
"Observation" in Aristotle's Theory of Epideictic.Christine Oravec - 1976 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (3):162 - 174.
Rhetoric, pragmatism, and practical wisdom.James A. Mackin Jr - 1990 - In Richard A. Cherwitz (ed.), Rhetoric and Philosophy. L. Erlbaum Associates.
Moral Judgment in States of Deliberative Equilibrium.Ricardo Parellada - 2006 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 31 (1):167-180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references