Science without representation

Analysis 70 (3):536-547 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I think van Fraassen is right to see the development of quantum mechanics as a turning point for physical science with a profound moral for philosophy, and not just for the philosophy of science. But the moral is not that even a completely successful physical theory may fail to account for the appearances by showing how they arise within the reality it represents. The moral is more radical: it is that a physical theory – even a fundamental theory – may be completely successful in all its applications without offering a representation of reality at all

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism.Mauricio Suárez - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):225-244.
Science as representation: Flouting the criteria.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):794-804.
Models as make-believe.Adam Toon - 2010 - In Roman Frigg & Matthew Hunter (eds.), Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science. Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science.
How Theories Represent.Otávio Bueno & Steven French - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):857-894.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-06-30

Downloads
167 (#115,284)

6 months
16 (#155,831)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Andrew Healey
University of Arizona

References found in this work

Against ”Measurement'.J. S. Bell - 2004 - In John Stewart Bell (ed.), Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics: collected papers on quantum philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 213--231.

Add more references