The best-supported language universals refer to scalar patterns deriving from processing cost

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):457-458 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conditional universals have always interested linguists more than unrestricted universals, which are often impossible to demonstrate empirically because categories cannot be defined in a cross-linguistically meaningful way. But deep dependencies have not been confirmed by more recent empirical research, and those universals with solid empirical support mostly relate to scalar patterns that can plausibly be related to processing cost.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Linguistics fit for dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
Blind men, elephants, and dancing information processors.Chris Westbury - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):645-646.
An Exclusive Volume on Exclusion.Pradeep P. Gokhale - 2013 - Philosophy East and West 63 (4):605-616.
Lukasiewicz's Many-valued Logic and Neoplatonic Scalar Modality.John N. Martin - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (2):95-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
23 (#682,085)

6 months
2 (#1,198,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references