Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (3):290-307 (2014)
AbstractIn an attempt to combat the positivist view that the only legitimate way to conduct social science is in the manner of a natural science, Knight distinguished between positivist and non-positivist categories or levels of interpretation of human-social subject matter. Since each of the categories contained ‘a large element of truth’, Knight argued that any serious analysis would need to embrace a pluralist approach. In this paper I draw on four separate accounts he gave (in 1934, 1940, 1941, and 1942) of these categories in order to arrive at a more complete statement. This fuller description will hopefully promote a deeper appreciation of Knight's emphasis on the need for adopting a pluralist approach to the subject matter of economics. I then apply the perspective of the categories to shed light on Knight's definition of economics and his criticism of Robbins' definition
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Methodology of Economics.M. Blaug - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (3):289-295.
Methodology of Economics and Other Social Sciences.Fritz Machlup - 1981 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):135-137.
The Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Lionel Robbins.Frank H. Knight - 1934 - International Journal of Ethics 44 (3):358-361.
The Economizing Element in Knight's Ethical Critique of Capitalist Order.James M. Buchanan - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):61-75.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Terence Hutchison and Frank Knight: A Reappraisal of Their 1940–1941 Exchange.John Hart - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (4):359-373.
Realism and Relevance in the Economics of a Free Society: The Knight–Hutchison Debate.Ross B. Emmett - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):341-350.
Book Reviews: Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight. Volume 1: What Is Truth in Economics?, Selected Essays by Frank H. Knight. Volume 2: Laissez-Faire: Pro and Con. [REVIEW]D. Wade Hands - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (4):590-593.
Buchanan's Catallactic Critique of Robbins' Definition of Economics.Alain Marciano - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):125-138.
Theorizing Risk & Uncertainty in Social Enquiry: Exploring the Contributions of Frank Knight.D. S. L. Jarvis - unknown
Frank H. Knight and Ethical Pluralism.Richard Boyd - 1997 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 11 (4):519-536.
Economics and WelfareTheories of Welfare Economics. Hla Myint.Frank H. Knight - 1951 - Ethics 61 (3):219-.
Cutting Cakes: A Study of Psychologists' Social Categorisations.Jonathan Potter - 1988 - Philosophical Psychology 1 (1):17 – 33.
Intellectual Confusion on Morals and Economics.Frank H. Knight - 1935 - International Journal of Ethics 45 (2):200-220.
Book Review:Christianity and Economics. Josiah Stamp. [REVIEW]Frank H. Knight - 1939 - Ethics 50 (2):226-.
The Construction of Ontological Categories.Jan Westerhoff - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):595 – 620.