Maturana’s autopoietic hermeneutics versus Turing’s causal methodology for explaining cognition [Book Review]

Pragmatics and Cognition 15 (3):599-603 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kravchenko suggests replacing Turing’s suggestion for explaining cognizers’ cognitive capacity through autonomous robotic modelling by ‘autopoiesis’, Maturana’s extremely vague metaphor for the relations and interactions among organisms, environments, and various subordinate and superordinate systems therein. I suggest that this would be an exercise in hermeneutics rather than causal explanation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Maturana Across the Disciplines.Pille Bunnell & Alexander Riegler - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (3):287-292.
The annotation game: On Turing (1950) on computing, machinery, and intelligence.Stevan Harnad - 2006 - In Robert Epstein & Grace Peters (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
13 (#1,036,774)

6 months
1 (#1,471,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stevan Harnad
McGill University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references