Can Man Transcend His Animality?

The Monist 55 (2):208-217 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Obviously any thinking a human being can do is human thinking. Any thinking a dog can do is doggish thinking. There is, however, one difference. A dog cannot think that he is thinking doggishly; but a man can think that he is thinking humanly. Every animal is in the prison of its own nature; but only genuinely "thinking" animals can know that this is so. To know a mental limit as such is to be, in some sense and degree, beyond that limit. In what sense and to what degree—this I take to be the question to be dealt with in this issue of The Monist.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Kind of Necessary Truth.Norman J. Brown - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (191):37-54.
A Kind of Necessary Truth.Norman J. Brown - 1975 - Philosophy 50 (191):37 - 54.
What is Called Thinking? [REVIEW]O. H. S. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (3):570-570.
Thinking, Thought, and Categories.Stephan Körner - 1983 - The Monist 66 (3):353-366.
The Heterogeneity of Thinking.Ludo Peferoen - 1989 - Review of Metaphysics 42 (4):717 - 742.
Editorial: Thinking Skills.[author unknown] - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (4):473-473.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
52 (#100,421)

6 months
52 (#296,892)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references