Hyperbolic Discounting, Selfhood and Irrationality

Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 22:71-78 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that George Ainslie’s model of Hyperbolic Discounting fails to yield strict akratic action. But it does yield a deflated view. Furthermore, by understanding the nature of a hyperbolically discounting self, we can also offer a deflated view of self-deception, according to which self-deception is motivated error by hyperbolic discounters who desire to view themselves as rational.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

If belief is a behavior, what controls it?George Ainslie - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):103-104.
What Can’t We Do with Economics?Ronald B. De Sousa - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:197-209.
A bazaar of opinions mostly fit within picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):664-670.
Measurement-theoretic foundations of time discounting in economics.Conrad Heilmann - 2008 - The Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science (CPNSS), London School of Economics.
Cruelty may be a self-control device against sympathy.George Ainslie - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):224-225.
“To do or not to do?” Modeling the control of behavior.John D. Swain & James E. Swain - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):662-663.
Altruism is a primary impulse, not a discipline.George Ainslie & Nick Haslam - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):251-251.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
25 (#633,346)

6 months
5 (#639,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references