Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):657-657 (2005)

Abstract
We question the behavioral premise underlying Ainslie's claims about hyperbolic discounting theory. The alleged evidence for humans can be easily explained as an artefact of experimental procedures that do not control for the credibility of payment over different time horizons. In appropriately controlled and financially motivated settings, human behavior is consistent with conventional exponential preferences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05290118
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Prospecting Neuroeconomics.Andreas Ortmann - 2008 - Economics and Philosophy 24 (3):431-448.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
45 ( #251,189 of 2,504,871 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,871 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes