Can there be a science of psychology? Aristotle’s de Anima and the structure and construction of science

Manuscrito 42 (4):469-515 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article considers whether and how there can be for Aristotle a genuine science of ‘pure’ psychology, of the soul as such, which amounts to considering whether Aristotle’s model of science in the Posterior Analytics is applicable to the de Anima.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-21

Downloads
539 (#36,410)

6 months
198 (#17,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

R. J. Hankinson
University of Texas at Austin

Citations of this work

Aristotle on Multiple Demonstration: a Reading of Posterior Analytics II 17-8.Breno Zuppolini & David Bronstein - 2023 - In Ricardo Santos & Antonio Pedro Mesquita (eds.), New Essays on Aristotle's Organon. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 170-190.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causality and Coextensiveness in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics 1.13.Lucas Angioni - 2018 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54:159-185.
Body and soul in Aristotle.Richard Sorabji - 1993 - In Michael Durrant (ed.), Aristotle's de Anima in Focus. New York: Routledge. pp. 63-.
Aristotle’s Philosophy of Mathematics.Jonathan Lear - 1982 - Philosophical Review 91 (2):161-192.
De anima II 5.Myles F. Burnyeat - 2002 - Phronesis 47 (1):28-90.

View all 15 references / Add more references