Neoclassical vs. classical economic models

&
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (1):107-113 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/004839318401400107

Other Versions

original Hammes, David L. (1984) "Neoclassical vs. Classical Economic Models". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14(1):107-113

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,411

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Lawrence A. Boland: The Foundations of Economic Method. [REVIEW]Jack Birner - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):215-221.
Economics According to Boland: "Methodology and Pedagogy".Raphael Sassower - 1992 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (2):241.
The Modal View and Defending Microeconomics.Steven Rappaport - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:289 - 297.
Review Essay: Is Homo Economics Extinct?Raphael Sassower - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):603-615.
Keynes, Sraffa and the Criticism of Neoclassical Theory: Essays in Honour of Heinz Kurz.Neri Salvadori & Christian Gehrke (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Reconciling Corporate Citizenship and Competitive Strategy: Insights from Economic Theory.Sylvia Maxfield - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):367-377.
Historical models and economic syllogisms.Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira - 2018 - Journal of Economic Methodology 25 (1):68-82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
40 (#444,858)

6 months
10 (#610,754)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references