The inauthentic evaluative schemes of psychopaths and culpability

In Luca Malatesti & John McMillan (eds.), Responsibility and Psychopathy: Interfacing Law, Psychiatry and Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Usa. pp. 261--282 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On psychopaths and culpability.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (2):117-140.
Evolutionary Explanation of Psychopaths.Seungbae Park - 2013 - International Journal of Social Science Studies 1 (2):1-7.
Multiple Selves and Culpability.Ishtiyaque Haji - 1997 - Legal Theory 3 (3):249-272.
The Responsibility of the Psychopathic Offender.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2003 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):175-183.
Argumentation schemes.Douglas Walton, Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Chris Reed & Fabrizio Macagno.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-31

Downloads
20 (#762,736)

6 months
5 (#625,697)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ishtiyaque Haji
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

Psychopaths and blame: The argument from content.Neil Levy - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology 27 (3):351–367.
Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action.Gabriel De Marco - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):1953-1972.
Moral responsibility and the psychopath.Walter Glannon - 2008 - Neuroethics 1 (3):158-166.
Manipulation, machine induction, and bypassing.Gabriel De Marco - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 180 (2):487-507.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references