Recursive chaos in defining art recursively

British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):73-83 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Art history cannot be sealed off in cultural isolation: given our innate forms of life, language, and human nature, cultural diversity is only skin deep. The identification of art by historical recursion could not be restricted to the fixed art history of one hermetically sealed cultural tradition because there is no such thing. Attempts to define artworks recursively thus lead to the absurdity that everything in the present might be art because of unknown art antecedents in earlier human cultures that we in a contemporary culture would not call art. Making the lack of a theory the theoretical point of a practice leads to chaos

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Art Without ‘Art’.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):1-15.
Trying to define art as the sum of the arts.Stephen Davies - 2008 - Pazhouhesh Nameh-E Farhangestan-E Honar (Research Journal of the Iranian Academy of the Arts) 8:12–23.
Response to Victor yelverton Haines.Richard Eldridge - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):188-189.
Thinking Art and Experiencing Artworks.Jean-Marie Shaeffer & Johanna Liu - 2005 - Philosophy and Culture 32 (12):31-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#119,765)

6 months
10 (#1,198,792)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references