Canjar Filters

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):79-95 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If $\mathcal{F}$ is a filter on $\omega$, we say that $\mathcal{F}$ is Canjar if the corresponding Mathias forcing does not add a dominating real. We prove that any Borel Canjar filter is $F_{\sigma}$, solving a problem of Hrušák and Minami. We give several examples of Canjar and non-Canjar filters; in particular, we construct a $\mathsf{MAD}$ family such that the corresponding Mathias forcing adds a dominating real. This answers a question of Brendle. Then we prove that in all the “classical” models of $\mathsf{ZFC}$ there are $\mathsf{MAD}$ families whose Mathias forcing does not add a dominating real. We also study ideals generated by branches, and we uncover a close relation between Canjar ideals and the selection principle $S_{\mathrm{fin}}$ on subsets of the Cantor space.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mathias–Prikry and Laver–Prikry type forcing.Michael Hrušák & Hiroaki Minami - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (3):880-894.
Small Filter forcing.R. Michael Canjar - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (3):526-546.
Combinatorial properties of classical forcing notions.Jörg Brendle - 1995 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 73 (2):143-170.
Combinatorics and forcing with distributive ideals.Pierre Matet - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 86 (2):137-201.
Forcing with filters and complete combinatorics.Claude Laflamme - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (2):125-163.
Unbounded and dominating reals in Hechler extensions.Justin Palumbo - 2013 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 78 (1):275-289.
Bounding and Dominating Number of Families of Functions on ω.Claude Laflamme - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (2):207-223.
Splitting families and forcing.Miloš S. Kurilić - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145 (3):240-251.
Universal forcing notions and ideals.Andrzej Rosłanowski & Saharon Shelah - 2007 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 46 (3-4):179-196.
More on simple forcing notions and forcings with ideals.M. Gitik & S. Shelah - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 59 (3):219-238.
Ordering MAD families a la Katětov.Michael Hrušák & Salvador García Ferreira - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1337-1353.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-07

Downloads
21 (#723,160)

6 months
5 (#633,186)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arturo Martinez
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana

Citations of this work

Covering properties of $$omega $$ω -mad families.Leandro Aurichi & Lyubomyr Zdomskyy - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (3-4):445-452.
Indestructibility of ideals and MAD families.David Chodounský & Osvaldo Guzmán - 2021 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (5):102905.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mathias–Prikry and Laver–Prikry type forcing.Michael Hrušák & Hiroaki Minami - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (3):880-894.
Forcing with filters and complete combinatorics.Claude Laflamme - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (2):125-163.
Mob families and mad families.Jörg Brendle - 1998 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 37 (3):183-197.
Analytic ideals and cofinal types.Alain Louveau & Boban Velickovi - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 99 (1-3):171-195.

View all 6 references / Add more references