Indestructibility of ideals and MAD families

&
Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 172 (5):102905 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this survey paper we collect several known results on destroying tall ideals on countable sets and maximal almost disjoint families with forcing. In most cases we provide streamlined proofs of the presented results. The paper contains results of many authors as well as a preview of results of a forthcoming paper of Brendle, Guzmán, Hrušák, and Raghavan.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/j.apal.2020.102905

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Forcing indestructibility of MAD families.Jörg Brendle & Shunsuke Yatabe - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (2):271-312.
Ideals of independence.Vera Fischer & Diana Carolina Montoya - 2019 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 58 (5-6):767-785.
Splitting families and forcing.Miloš S. Kurilić - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145 (3):240-251.
Covering properties of ideals.Marek Balcerzak, Barnabás Farkas & Szymon Gła̧b - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (3-4):279-294.
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibility.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (1):314-322.
Ordering MAD families a la Katětov.Michael Hrušák & Salvador García Ferreira - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1337-1353.
Intersection numbers of families of ideals.M. Hrušák, C. A. Martínez-Ranero, U. A. Ramos-García & O. A. Téllez-Nieto - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (3-4):403-417.
Universal indestructibility for degrees of supercompactness and strongly compact cardinals.Arthur W. Apter & Grigor Sargsyan - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (2):133-142.
Descriptive set theory of families of small sets.Étienne Matheron & Miroslav Zelený - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (4):482-537.
Indestructibility, measurability, and degrees of supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):75-82.
Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness.Arthur W. Apter & Joel David Hamkins - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):820-840.
Some remarks on indestructibility and Hamkins? lottery preparation.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 42 (8):717-735.
Reducing the consistency strength of an indestructibility theorem.Arthur W. Apter - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (3):288-293.
Canjar Filters.Osvaldo Guzmán, Michael Hrušák & Arturo Martínez-Celis - 2017 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 58 (1):79-95.
Cardinal coefficients associated to certain orders on ideals.Piotr Borodulin-Nadzieja & Barnabás Farkas - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):187-202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-15

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Happy families.A. R. D. Mathias - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):59.
Mathias–Prikry and Laver–Prikry type forcing.Michael Hrušák & Hiroaki Minami - 2014 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 165 (3):880-894.
Forcing with quotients.Michael Hrušák & Jindřich Zapletal - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (7-8):719-739.
Forcing indestructibility of MAD families.Jörg Brendle & Shunsuke Yatabe - 2005 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132 (2):271-312.

View all 16 references / Add more references