Impugning Randomness, Convincingly

Studia Logica 100 (1-2):193-222 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John organized a state lottery and his wife won the main prize. You may feel that the event of her winning wasn’t particularly random, but how would you argue that in a fair court of law? Traditional probability theory does not even have the notion of random events. Algorithmic information theory does, but it is not applicable to real-world scenarios like the lottery one. We attempt to rectify that

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-08

Downloads
61 (#91,027)

6 months
7 (#1,397,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations