8 Constructive Realism and the Question of Imputation

In Michael Krausz (ed.), Is There a Single Right Interpretation? Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 145-158 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Limits of Rightness.Michael Krausz - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
In Search of Just Families. [REVIEW]Robert Morgan - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):448-450.
Is There a Single Right Interpretation?Michael Krausz (ed.) - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Theory-dependence, warranted reference, and the epistemic dimensions of realism.Frederick Kroon - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (2):173-191.
Is there a single right interpretation?Colin Lyas - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):338-340.
Scientific Realism and Constructive Empiricism.Alexander A. Pechenkin - 2020 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 57 (2):179-191.
Constructive Empiricism and Modal Nominalism.Monton Bradley & Fraassen Bas C. Van - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (3):405 - 422.
Is There a Single Right Interpretation?Michael Krausz - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):200-202.
The natural numbers in constructive set theory.Michael Rathjen - 2008 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 54 (1):83-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-09

Downloads
2 (#1,819,493)

6 months
2 (#1,259,876)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references