Winch Reassessed

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hutchinson, Read, and Sharrock have provided an important analysis of the work of Peter Winch. They succeed in rescuing his philosophy from many of the distorting characterizations and categorizations to which it has been subjected, and they provide a fresh account of its relevance for thinking about the theory and practice of social science

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1177/0048393109352866

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Book Review: Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read, and Wes Sharrock: There is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. Directions in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis Farnham, UK: Ashgate Press, 2008. 156 pp. £50.00 (hardcover). [REVIEW]Patrick J. J. Phillips - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (2):295-297.
There is no such thing as social science: In defence of Peter Winch – by Phil Hutchinson, Rupert read and Wes Sharrock.Carolyn Wilde - 2009 - Philosophical Investigations 33 (2):191-199.
Peter Winch and the Autonomy of the Social Sciences.Jonas Ahlskog - 2022 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 52 (3):150-174.
There Is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch.Pavel Stepantsov - 2010 - Russian Sociological Review 9 (3):129-150.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch.K. J. Morris - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
There is No Such Thing as Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch. [REVIEW]Phil Hutchinson, Rupert Read & Wes Sharrock - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):795-797.
Rules, Intentions and Social Behavior: A Reassessment of Peter Winch.Jordi Fairhurst - 2019 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 50 (4):429-445.
Peter Winch and the Philosophy of the Social Sciences: A Critical Analysis.James Ralph Piggush - 1974 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
The idea of an ethically committed social science.Leonidas Tsilipakos - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (2):144-166.
The pincer movement of The Idea of a Social Science: Winch, Collingwood, and philosophy as a human science.Jonas Ahlskog & Olli Lagerspetz - 2024 - History of the Human Sciences 37 (1):28-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
43 (#381,354)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions.David Bloor - 1997 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (2):400-401.

Add more references