Winch Reassessed

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hutchinson, Read, and Sharrock have provided an important analysis of the work of Peter Winch. They succeed in rescuing his philosophy from many of the distorting characterizations and categorizations to which it has been subjected, and they provide a fresh account of its relevance for thinking about the theory and practice of social science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Winch and Anscombe on Ethics and Religion.Howard Mounce - 2011 - Philosophical Investigations 34 (3):241-248.
Can social science be just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Winch and romanticism.D. Z. Phillips - 2002 - Philosophy 77 (2):261-279.
Winch on moral dilemmas and moral modality.Craig Taylor - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):148 – 157.
Iv. understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
43 (#371,989)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions.David Bloor - 1997 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (2):400-401.

Add more references