The influence of psychological resilience on the relation between automatic stimulus evaluation and attentional breadth for surprised faces

&
Cognition and Emotion 29 (1):146-157 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/02699931.2014.895299

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Automatic preference for white americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation.Anthony Greenwald - manuscript
Automatic Preference for White Americans: Eliminating the Familiarity Explanation.Debbie E. McGhee - unknown
How automatic is “automatic vigilance”? The role of working memory in attentional interference of negative information.Lotte F. Van Dillen & Sander L. Koole - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (6):1106-1117.
Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings.Daniel Barratt & Claus Bundesen - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (7):1223-1237.
Love and death.Dan Moller - 2007 - Journal of Philosophy 104 (6):301-316.
Depression-related attentional bias: The influence of symptom severity and symptom specificity.Saskia Baert, Rudi De Raedt & Ernst Hw Koster - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (6):1044-1052.
Shouldn't We be Surprised that We are Not Surprised when We Should be Surprised?Floyd Merrell - 2005 - Semiotica 2005 (153 - 1/4):85-100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-11-07

Downloads
12 (#1,078,270)

6 months
4 (#779,041)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references