A lesson from subjective computing: autonomous self-referentiality and social interaction as conditions for subjectivity

AISB Proceedings 2012:18-28 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we model a relational notion of subjectivity by means of two experiments in subjective computing. The goal is to determine to what extent a cognitive and social robot can be regarded to act subjectively. The system was implemented as a reinforcement learning agent with a coaching function. To analyze the robotic agent we used the method of levels of abstraction in order to analyze the agent at four levels of abstraction. At one level the agent is described in mentalistic or subjective language respectively. By mapping this mentalistic to an algorithmic, functional, and relational level, we can show to what extent the agent behaves subjectively as we make use of a relational concept of subjectivity that draws upon the relations that hold between the agent and its environment. According to a relational notion of subjectivity, an agent is supposed to be subjective if it exhibits autonomous relations to itself and others, i.e. the agent is not fully determined by a given input but is able to operate on its input and decide what to do with it. This theoretical notion is confirmed by the technical implementation of self-referentiality and social interaction in that the agent shows improved behavior compared to agents without the ability of subjective computing. On the one hand, a relational concept of subjectivity is confirmed, whereas on the other hand, the technical framework of subjective computing is being theoretically founded.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of designing artificial agents.Frances S. Grodzinsky, Keith W. Miller & Marty J. Wolf - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):115-121.
Autonomous agents with norms.Frank Dignum - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (1):69-79.
The ethics of designing artificial agents.S. Grodzinsky Frances, W. Miller Keith & J. Wolf Marty - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):112-121.
Measuring Belief and Risk Attitude.Sven Neth - 2019 - Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 297:354–364.
Rational Communication in Multi-Agent Environments.Piotr J. Gmytrasiewicz & Edmund H. Durfee - 2001 - Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 4 (1).
From Valuing to Value: A Defense of Subjectivism.David Sobel - 2016 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Can Analytical Sociology Do without Methodological Individualism?Nathalie Bulle & Denis Phan - 2017 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 47 (6):379-409.
Design Issues in Ethical Agent Computing.L. Pretorius, A. Barnard & E. Cloete - 2004 - Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 34 (1):3.
Towards a Lacanian Group Psychology: The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Trans‐subjective.Derek Hook - 2013 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (2):115-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-07

Downloads
604 (#30,961)

6 months
69 (#81,789)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Grüneberg
Kanazawa University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations