Infinitely nested Chinese “black boxes”: Linguists and the search for Universal (innate) Grammar

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (2):339-340 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Universal grammar is dead.Michael Tomasello - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):470-471.
Nested PLS.Toshiyasu Arai - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (3-4):395-409.
“Grammar box” in the brain.Valéria Csépe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):672-673.
Black Box Arguments.Sally Jackson - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):437-446.
How good is the linguistic analogy?Susan Dwyer - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 145--167.
Why grammar cannot be innate.Robert W. Burch - 1976 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):37-44.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
20 (#765,631)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aspects of the Theory of Syntax.Noam Chomsky - 1965 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use.Noam Chomsky - 1986 - Prager. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky (ed.) - 1980 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Introduction to mathematical philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1919 - New York: Dover Publications.

View all 38 references / Add more references