How good is the linguistic analogy?

In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York, US: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 145--167 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A nativist moral psychology, modeled on the successes of theoretical linguistics, provides the best framework for explaining the acquisition of moral capacities and the diversity of moral judgment across the species. After a brief presentation of a poverty of the moral stimulus argument, this chapter sketches a view according to which a so-called Universal Moral Grammar provides a set of parameterizable principles whose specific values are set by the child's environment, resulting in the acquisition of a moral idiolect. The principles and parameters approach predicts moral diversity, but does not entail moral relativism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analogy, Symbolism, and Linguistic Analysis.William L. Reese - 1960 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (3):447 - 468.
The Role of Focus in Aquinas’s Doctrine of Analogy.Antonio Donato - 2003 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:289-301.
Corporate punishment: A proposal. [REVIEW]Robert J. Rafalko - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):917 - 928.
Analogy and metaphor: Two models of linguistic.William Gay - 1980 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 7 (3-4):300-317.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
205 (#94,707)

6 months
20 (#126,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susan Jane Dwyer
University of Maryland, College Park

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references