American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):307-321 (2007)
AbstractIn the "Ethics", Abelard discusses the example of a judge who knowingly convicts an innocent defendant. He claims that this judge does rightly when he punishes the innocent man to the full extent of the law. Yet this claim seems counterintuitive, and, at first glance, contrary to Abelard’s own ethical system. Nevertheless, I argue that Abelard’s ethical system cannot be viewed as completely subjective, since the rightness of an individual act of consent is grounded in objective standards established by God. Likewise, any particular civil government must derive its authority objectively from the natural and/or Christian laws, which ground its possibility and function. In this paper, I examine Abelard’s explication of the natural law, discoverable through reason, and the divine laws, knowable only through revelation, in order to explore what form an adequate civil law would have to take under which the judge could be said to have acted rightly.
Similar books and articles
Challenges for the Creation of a European Law of Civil Procedure.Paulien M. M. van der Grinten - unknown
Divine Law and Political Philosophy in Plato's Laws.Mark J. Lutz - 2012 - Northern Illinois University Press.
‘Law and Order’ and Civil Disobedience.Fred R. Berger - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):254 – 273.
Are Thoughts and Sentences Compositional? A Controversy Between Abelard and a Pupil of Alberic on the Reconciliation of Ancient Theses on Mind and Language.Martin Lenz - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):169-188.
Judicial Responses to Civil Disobedience: A Comparative Approach.Sophie Turenne - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):379-399.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads