Are evolutionary/cognitive theories of religion relevant for philosophy of religion?

Zygon 45 (3):545-557 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Biological theories of religious belief are sometimes understood to undermine the very beliefs they are describing, proposing an alternative explanation for the causes of belief different from that given by religious believers themselves. This article surveys three categories of biological theorizing derived from evolutionary biology, cognitive science of religion, and neuroscience. Although each field raises important issues and in some cases potential challenges to the legitimacy of religious belief, in most cases the significance of these theories for the holding of religious beliefs is not very great

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Science of Religion.James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.) - 2013 - New York: Routledge.
Does the Scientific Study of Religion Cast Doubt on Theistic Belief?Joshua C. Thurow - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain, Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford ; New York, NY: Oxford University Press. pp. 277-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-11

Downloads
225 (#119,083)

6 months
1 (#1,597,861)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?