Relation between stimulus intensity and operant response rate as a function of discrimination training and drive

Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):9 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0021626

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):24.
Rate of response during operant discrimination.Moncrieff H. Smith Jr & William J. Hoy - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (4):259.
Transfer of training across stimulus modality and response class.Jerome Frieman & Charles H. Goyette - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (2):235.
Effects of extradimensional pseudodiscrimination and discrimination training upon stimulus control.Elaine L. Bresnahan - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (1):155.
The relation between conditioned stimulus intensity and response strength.Charles C. Perkins Jr - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (4):225.
Operant suppression of electrodermal response rate as a function of punishment schedule.Andrew Crider, Gary E. Schwartz & David Shapiro - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):333.
Relationship between generalization and discrimination: Training and the definition of response.Donald A. Schumsky - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):470.
Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Harley M. Hanson - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):321.
Cue and contextual stimulus intensity in discrimination learning.John E. Nygaard - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (2):195.
The nature of acoustic response: the relation between sound intensity and the magnitude of responses in the cochlea.E. G. Wever & C. W. Bray - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (2):129.
Gradients of drive stimulus (Sd) intensity generalization.Harry G. Yamaguchi - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 43 (4):298.
Analysis of stimulus generalization with a psychophysical method.Eric G. Heinemann, Edward Avin, Mary A. Sullivan & Sheila Chase - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):215.
The reinforcing signal as a conditioned stimulus in human operant discrimination training.Howard B. Orenstein, Donald A. Schumsky, Thomas Roth & John Trinder - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (5):381-384.
Response duration during an operant discrimination.M. H. Kellicutt - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 73 (1):56.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
24 (#654,246)

6 months
7 (#421,763)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references