Operant suppression of electrodermal response rate as a function of punishment schedule

, &
Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (2p1):333 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0028532

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Effects of CS and UCS relationships on electrodermal response and heart rate.George H. Zimny, John A. Stern & Stanton P. Fjeld - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):177.
Some effects of observing a model's reinforcement schedule and rate of responding on extinction and response rate.Betty L. Borden & Glenn M. White - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (1):41.
Response rate as a function of magnitude and schedule of heat reinforcement.Frank C. Leeming - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (1p1):74.
Suppression of gsr activity through operant reinforcement.Harold J. Johnson & Gary E. Schwartz - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (3):307.
Relation between stimulus intensity and operant response rate as a function of discrimination training and drive.Jeffrey A. Gray - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (1):9.
Rate of response during operant discrimination.Moncrieff H. Smith Jr & William J. Hoy - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (4):259.
Alcohol effects on operant-rate frequency spectra are schedule-dependent.Lowell T. Crow - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (5):445-447.
Operant extinction as a function of the extinction schedule.Donald H. Bullock - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):437.
Performance in different segments of an instrumental response chain as a function of reinforcement schedule.Kenneth P. Goodrich - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1):57.
Does conditioned suppression measure the resistance to change of operant behaviour?Julian C. Leslie - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):103-104.
Comparison of two methods for producing response inhibition in electrodermal conditioning.William W. Grings, Cheryl A. Carey & Anne M. Schell - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):658.
Concept and rule utilization in the acquisition of an electrodermal response.Thomas E. Malloy & Stewart Proctor - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):370.
A test of the predicted relation describing the change in response rate with the number of intervals on an FI schedule.Ernest Dzendolet - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (6):579-582.
Human orienting reaction as a function of electrodermal versus plethysmographic response modes and single versus alternating stimulus series.John J. Furedy - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#616,937)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references