In Defense of Psychologism About Reasons

In Martin Grajner & Pedro Schmechtig (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals. De Gruyter. pp. 33-50 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What we belief with justification, we generally believe for a reason. But what are epistemic reasons? In this paper, I defend psychologism about epistemic reasons against two important challenges.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/9783110496765-003

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In Defense of Psychologism About Reasons.Martin Grajner - 2016 - In Pedro Schmechtig & Martin Grajner (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Norms, and Goals. De Gruyter. pp. 33-50.
Psychologism and conceptual semantics.Luke Jerzykiewicz & Sam Scott - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):682-683.
Psychologism, practical reason and the possibility of error.Eric Wiland - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):68–78.
Reasons for action, acting for reasons, and rationality.Maria Alvarez - 2018 - Synthese 195 (8):3293-3310.
Logical reasons.Pascal Engel - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):21 – 38.
In Defence of Psychologism.Tim Crane - 2014 - In Aspects of Psychologism. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Dilemma of Psychologism and Anti-psychologism.Valentin Bazhanov - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 49 (3):6-16.
Inverse psychologism in the theory of judgment.Wayne Martin - manuscript
Beyond Psychologism and Anti-Psychologism.Lilian O’Brien - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (2):281-295.
Why Philosophy Needs Logical Psychologism.Vanessa Lehan-Streisel - 2012 - Dialogue 51 (4):575-586.
Varieties of psychologism.Adrian Cussins - 1987 - Synthese 70 (1):123 - 154.
Relativism and the New Psychologisms.William Max Knorpp - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Turing tests for intelligence: Ned Block's defense of psychologism. [REVIEW]Robert C. Richardson - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (May):421-6.
Truthy psychologism about evidence.Veli Mitova - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):1105-1126.
Paul Natorp and the emergence of anti-psychologism in the nineteenth century.Scott Edgar - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):54-65.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
10 (#1,189,467)

6 months
5 (#628,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Martin Grajner
Technische Universität Dresden

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references