Clubbish justice

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):233-237 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kai Spiekermann shows how groups of people cooperating purely for mutual advantage could solve social dilemmas by `assortation', deftly including and excluding people from the group of people who are cooperating among themselves. This article explores the normative implications of that result, casting further doubt on normative models treating justice as a `club good'. Key Words: justice • club • non-ideal theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reply: Clubbish justice.Kai Spiekermann - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):447-453.
Hume and mutual advantage.John Salter - 2012 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):302-321.
Justice as mutual advantage and the vulnerable.Peter Vanderschraaf - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):119-147.
Justice: A conservative view.John Kekes - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):88-108.
Elements of justice.David Schmidtz - 2006 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Social justice and legal justice.Wojciech Sadurski - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):329 - 354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
55 (#289,847)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Goodin
Australian National University

Citations of this work

The Open Society and Its Complexities.Robert E. Goodin - 2023 - Philosophical Review 132 (1):163-167.
Competition and Justice in Adam Smith.Timo Jütten - 2023 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 61 (1):206-232.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references