Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):pp. 145-160 (2010)

Abstract
In an essay on performance-enhancing drugs, author Chuck Klosterman (2007) argues that the category of enhancers extends from hallucinogens used to inspire music to steroids used to strengthen athletes—and he criticizes those who would excuse one means of enhancement while railing against the other as a form of cheating: After the summer of 1964, the Beatles started taking serious drugs, and those drugs altered their musical performance. Though it may not have been their overt intent, the Beatles took performance-enhancing drugs. And . . . absolutely no one holds it against them. No one views “Rubber Soul” and “Revolver” as “less authentic” albums, despite the fact that they would not (and probably could ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.0.0309
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomy, Rationality, and Contemporary Bioethics.Jonathan Pugh - 2020 - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
The Myth of Cognitive Enhancement Drugs.Hazem Zohny - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (3):257-269.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-06-19

Total views
4,388 ( #691 of 2,520,416 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #9,435 of 2,520,416 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes