- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
It Does Not Matter Whether Research Interventions Are Usual Care
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):47-48 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author Profiles
My notes
Similar books and articles
How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent.Jerry Menikoff - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):1-3.
Misuse of “Usual Care” in Emergency Care Research: A Call for Adapting Rules Governing Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) Studies.Ethan Cowan, Kate Sahan & Mark Sheehan - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):59-61.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
Charles Edward Cory 1878-1965.Lewis E. Hahn - 1964 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 38:92 -.
Let the Punishment Fit the Crime: Sensible Consent in the Management of Human Subjects Research and Standard-of-Care Interventions.Ross E. McKinney - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):22-23.
The Importance of Describing as Well as Defining Usual Care.Stuart G. Nicholls, Merrick Zwarenstein & Monica Taljaard - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):56-58.
Ethics of research in usual care settings: Data on point.Jeremy Sugarman - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2):71-75.
Community Perspectives Are Essential to Assess Risk in Emergent Care Research.Anushka Chalmeti & Jason Lesandrini - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):113-115.
The Inducement of Meaningful Work: A Response to Anderson and Weijer.Terrence P. Mc Eachern - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (5):427-430.
Role Synergy Versus Role Conflict in Dual-Role Consent in Usual Care Trials.Elizabeth A. Kitsis - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):42-43.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-01-03
Downloads
22 (#700,635)
6 months
7 (#592,070)
2020-01-03
Downloads
22 (#700,635)
6 months
7 (#592,070)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
Don’t Blame Hippocrates for Low Enrollment in Clinical Trials.John D. Lantos - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):1-3.
References found in this work
Misrepresenting “Usual Care” in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):31-39.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
An Ethical Analysis of the SUPPORT Trial: Addressing Challenges Posed by a Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trial.Austin R. Horn, Charles Weijer, Jeremy Grimshaw, Jamie Brehaut, Dean Fergusson, Cory E. Goldstein & Monica Taljaard - 2018 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 28 (1):85-118.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-sqlzn uwo