It Does Not Matter Whether Research Interventions Are Usual Care

&
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):47-48 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2019.1687779

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Lessons from Everyday Lives: A Moral Justification for Acute Care Research.Andrew D. McRae & Charles Weijer - unknown
What Should Be Disclosed to Research Participants?David Wendler - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):3-8.
The ethics of research on less expensive, less effective interventions: A case for analysis. [REVIEW]Merle Spriggs - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):295-302.
Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Interventions: Semantics Matter.Alexander A. Kon - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):383-389.
Misrepresenting “Usual Care” in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):31-39.
Misuse of “Usual Care” in Emergency Care Research: A Call for Adapting Rules Governing Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC) Studies.Ethan Cowan, Kate Sahan & Mark Sheehan - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):59-61.
Patient Perspectives on the Learning Health System: The Importance of Trust and Shared Decision Making.Maureen Kelley, Cyan James, Stephanie Alessi Kraft, Diane Korngiebel, Isabelle Wijangco, Emily Rosenthal, Steven Joffe, Mildred K. Cho, Benjamin Wilfond & Sandra Soo-Jin Lee - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):4-17.
Informed Consent and Standard of Care: What Must Be Disclosed.Ruth Macklin & Lois Shepherd - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (12):9-13.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Misrepresenting ‘Usual Care’ in Research: An Ethical and Scientific Error”.Ruth Macklin & Charles Natanson - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):W12-W14.
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. [REVIEW]Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Austin R. Horn & Monica Taljaard - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):14.
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation. [REVIEW]Cory E. Goldstein, Charles Weijer, Jamie C. Brehaut, Dean A. Fergusson, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Austin R. Horn & Monica Taljaard - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):1-10.
Ethical considerations in psychotherapy effectiveness research: Choosing the comparison group.Patricia A. Areán & Jennifer Alvidrez - 2002 - Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):63 – 73.
Ethical Considerations in Psychotherapy Effectiveness Research: Choosing the Comparison Group.Jennifer Alvidrez & Patricia A. Areán - 2002 - Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):63-73.
How Conducting “Usual Care” Research Might Affect Obtaining Consent.Jerry Menikoff - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (4):1-3.
From Epistemic Trespassing to Transdisciplinary Cooperation: The Role of Expertise in the Identification of Usual Care.Joseph Michael Vukov, Kit Rempala, Molly Klug & Marley Hornewer - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):52-54.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-03

Downloads
21 (#720,615)

6 months
8 (#347,798)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Charles Weijer
University of Western Ontario
Cory E. Goldstein
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references