33. Conclusion: We Each Sit in Judgment

In Reason, Truth and Reality. University of Toronto Press. pp. 318-320 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Abstraction and the Rule of Law.William Lucy - 2009 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (3):481-509.
In Sensible Judgment.Max Deutscher - 2012 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 16 (1):203-225.
The Concept of Political Judgment.Peter J. Steinberger - 1993 - University of Chicago Press.
Legal Judgment as a Philosophical Archetype.Giovanni Tuzet - 2011 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 3 (2):275-288.
Critique of judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - New York: Barnes & Noble. Edited by J. H. Bernard.
Reliable Methods of Judgment Aggregation.Stephan Hartmann, Gabriella Pigozzi & Jan Sprenger - 2007 - Journal for Logic and Computation 20:603--617.
Causal judgment and moral judgment: Two experiments.Joshua Knobe & Ben Fraser - 2008 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology. MIT Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-11

Downloads
8 (#1,313,626)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Goldstick
University of Toronto, St. George Campus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references