A Philosophical Basis for Judicial Restraint

Howard Law Journal 62 (2):481-510 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to establish a principled basis for restraint of judicial lawmaking. The principle is that all findings of fact, whether of legislative or adjudicative facts, must be based on evidence in the record of a case. This principle is grounded in moral philosophy. I will begin with a discussion of the relevant aspect of moral philosophy, then state and defend the principle, and finally apply it to a line of cases.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The virtue of judicial humility.Amalia Amaya - 2018 - Jurisprudence 9 (1):97-107.
Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint.Jeff A. King - 2008 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (3):409-441.
Modest judicial restraint.M. T. - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (3):243-270.
Modest judicial restraint.Theodore M. Benditt - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (3):243 - 270.
Legal Theory, and Judicial Restraint. [REVIEW]Catherine Kemp - 2010 - Philosophical Inquiry 32 (3-4):118-120.
The Abuse of Principle.Frederic R. Kellogg - 2011 - Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 97 (2):218-223.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-19

Downloads
14 (#983,512)

6 months
8 (#351,566)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references